Home > Technical Articles > Formaldehyde

Formaldehyde Testing, Aldehydes and Ketones, HPLC and GCMS Analysis

Introduction

Formaldehyde (and other aldehydes and ketones) can be determined by several chromatographic methods. The old chromatropic acid method for 

formaldehyde (NIOSH 3500) has been replaced by methods using two oxazolidone derivatization techniques followed by gas chromatography (GC); tubes treated with the derivatizing agent are used for sampling air. 

Formaldehyde by HPLC 

EPA has published methods using dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) derivatization followed by liquid chromatography (LC). Both the GC and LC methods can be applied to other aldehydes, while the DNPH-LC method is also applicable to ketones as well. The EPA methods have been published for water and wastes (Formaldehyde, EPA 8315A) and air (EPA TO-5 and TO-11). The California Air Resources Board Method 430 and EPA TO-5 use impingers for sampling air, while TO-11 uses silica gel tubes coated with DNPH.

An example LC chromatogram below demonstrates the analysis of 14 common aldehydes and ketones using DNPH derivatives. This method is not without problems.  While it generally works well in fairly clean waters, we have noted that recoveries are often low in highly contaminated or alkaline samples.

We can supply you with sampling media and analysis for all the methods listed above.  

For a quotation...

Aldehyde - DNPH - HPLC


Formaldehyde by GCMS and LC-MS/MS

Many methods have been developed over the years to measure formaldehyde. Currently, we typically use HPLC to determine formaldehyde after derivatization with 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH), which forms derivatives with aldehydes and ketones. This method is sensitive (detection limit in water is approximately 6 ppb) and relatively specific, since the derivative has an absorbance maximum at 360 nm.

Although interferences are greatly reduced at this wavelength, they are not eliminated entirely. Other colored

 compounds, though chemically unrelated, may interfere with the formaldehyde peak. In these instances, GCMS can be used as a confirmatory technique. For GCMS, the derivative is extracted from aqueous solution using a suitable solvent, such as toluene. Although the GCMS method lacks the sensitivity of the HPLC method (detection limit approx. 1 ppm), the use of a mass spectrometer for detection allows positive identification of the formaldehyde-DNPH derivative (see Figure).

LC-MS/MS can also be done.  The detection limit is ~20 ug/L, and because of the MS/MS interferences are eliminated.

 Formaldehyde - DNPH, GCMS analysis

Other carbonyl compounds, such as acetaldehyde, propionaldehyde, acrolein and acetone, have also been detected using this approach, and many other compounds may also be amenable.

If you have any questions about formaldehyde, and whether GCMS may be able to solve your specific problem, give Mike Shelton a call at extension 702.


EPA Method 556

EPA Method 556 offers yet another alternative to measuring formaldehyde and other aldehydes.  This method uses pentafluorobenzyl hydroxylamine (PFBHA) to form oxime derivatives of the aldehydes in an aqueous solution at pH 4.  The derivatives are extracted into hexane and analyzed by GC-ECD or GCMS.  Of course the ECD offers the best detection limits (<1 ug/L for most

compounds).  GCMS has better specificity but only has detection limits in the range of ~10 ug/L.  

The chromatogram below is taken from EPA Method 556.  Note that most aldehydes which are assymetrical around the  carbonyl group produce both E and Z isomers, i.e. two peaks per compound.

For a quotation...

GC-ECD Chromatogram for EPA 556, Column A

Chromatographic Legend for EPA 556


Formaldehyde in Hair Products and Cosmetics

In 2010, suppliers of hair products argued that their products contained methylene glycol, the hydrated form of formaldehyde, rather than formadehyde itself.  Regulators took the position that methylene glycol is simply the water solution form of formaldehyde and that the regulations apply. 

However, there are some products which use formaldehyde precursors (aka formaldehyde releasers).  The procedures above do not distinguish between formaldehyde (as methylene glycol) and these easily hydrolyzed formaldehyde precursors.  There are two procedures which have been published which can distinguish these species: (1) HPLC with post column derivatization and (2) quantitative 13C NMR.  Call for more information on these tests.

 

For a full listing of Exova services, please visit our new Exova web site,  Exova Pharmaceutical Solutions web site and our new Santa Fe Springs laboratory home page.

Exova

9240 Santa Fe Springs Rd
Santa Fe Springs, CA 90670
562.948.2225   Fax 562.948.5850
info400@exova.com

Exova

Formerly West Coast Analytical Service (WCAS) and Bodycote Testing Group